A lot of people argues that you should always take the shortest route from point A to B which is a straight line. Therefore, attacks involving swings and spins are almost guaranteed not-to-work.

The bottom line is that anything can work if used at the right time – one can’t defend what they cannot see or anticipate. In the old days, I have seen people being so technique oriented or driven that at a tournament, he keep doing spins after spins without landing any. I have also seen people who is so arrogant about their approach/theory that they got knocked out without even knowing what hit them.

There was a period when MMA was dominated totally by those that do ground fighting and therefore people think that the outcome of a fight between a standup fighter to a ground fighter is a foregone conclusion. It was indeed almost true for a period, but that was when nobody really understands the ‘ground game’. However, things evolved and you see a lot more standups now… you can even see techniques that was deemed impossible at one point in time actually working within the octagon.

Exercise
What am I trying to explain? Refer back to the 3 pillars.
Watch the video carefully, try to identify opportunities for spins (if you are the spinner) and try to read telegraphs before the spin (as the defending person).

Taking the long route